PIM Project 3 Sketch 1.4

Sketch 1.4

(rehearsal-time lapse)

From our chosen case study, #Selfie #NoFilter by Patrick Kelly, we identified the affordance of interaction as we felt that a selfie when shared online allowed for interaction between people.

 

IMG_2550 from GUO on Vimeo.

Sketch 1.4 is the same bunch of people doing the rehearsal. I have to admit this one was not good, because it was too short. I wanted to compare to previous one and see what is different between time lapse and normal model. As we can saw that when we using the time lapse, people were moving quickly. It becomes unreality, we can saw people move quick and when they interacted with others, they are more bit of  like robots. as we can see how people interact with others in the time lapse mode. Without the voice, the viewers may have no idea what is going on when they moved their hands.

The problem of this sketch is that it was very short, because the time lapse model is that shooting one minute for one second time lapse. the other problem is that it was not very clearly to see it because I was shot this one at night in the dark living room.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s